Massive SIR Deletions: Over 90 lakh names, or 11.85% of the pre-SIR Bengal electorate, have been deleted from the electoral rolls, The Telegraph reports. In seven districts that have considerable Muslim presence, 17,10,764 names have been deleted following adjudication. North 24-Parganas and Nadia which hold substantial Matua (scheduled caste migrants from Bangladesh), too have seen massive deletions, leading to allegations of discrimination.
Reservation Bills: In a special parliament session starting April 16, the government will introduce draft bills for amendments to women’s reservation laws. This will make way for the implementation of the 33% reservation for women in the Parliament from 2029. It will increase the number of seats from 543 to 816 with 273 seats reserved for women. But this requires the delimitation exercise to be completed on the basis of the 2027 census, as the opposition has pointed out.
Electoral Patriarchy: In the US, where the discourse in the ultraconservative quarters is increasingly sounding like something out of The Handmaiden’s Tale, the latest buzz is that women should give up their right to vote, reports the New York Times. The household vote should be entirely ceded to the husband, this lot says, and unmarried women should ideally be represented by fathers, brothers and uncles. The problems, they say, are two fold – one women’s suffrage “divides” families and two, that women’s “natural tenderness” would make them susceptible, heaven forbid, to supporting liberal policies.
Mano In Africa: Guardian reports that manosphere, having taken wings in Europe and the US, is now spreading fast across Africa. “The ideas that shape the manosphere are linked to those of men’s rights organisations like Maendeleo ya Wanaume. Its big argument was that men and boys were being left behind as a result of all of the investments that had been made around girls’ and women’s rights,” says Awino Okech, a professor of feminist and security studies at Soas University of London. The conversations in this sphere are standardly and uniformly nauseating.
Anti Auntie: There was a time when being called “auntie” was considered ageist, lookist and sexist. Then auntie-hood was reclaimed because it represents the woman who doesn’t care how she looked or what she wore and most importantly, spoke her mind bluntly. Last week, however, an employment tribunal in the UK ruled in favour of NHS worker Ilda Esteves who alleged that she was subjected to harassment from coworker Charles Oppong who repeatedly called her “auntie”. He claimed it was a term of respect but she countered that she asked him to stop but he did not. He also apparently suggested that an older colleague would be a “good match” for her.