Fund cuts for scholarship schemes for students belonging to the marginalized communities is a result of the overall decline in the share of spending on education within the total union budget over the past five years — which has fallen from 3.7% in 2017 to 2.7% in 2021. In the last fiscal year alone, the education sector has seen a reduction of 6.13% in spending on education.
The New Education Policy (2020), just like the first released in 1968, recommends spending at least 6% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) towards education to achieve equality and inclusion. The current year’s allocation is 0.42% of GDP, a drop from 0.49% in 2017-2018.
According to the All India Secondary Higher Education (AISHE) 2019-20 report, Scheduled Caste (SC) students constitute 14.7% and Scheduled Tribe (ST) students 5.6% of the total students enrolled in schools. 37% of students belong to Other Backward Classes (OBC),5.5% are Muslims and 2.3% belong to other minority communities.
The national gross enrolment ratio (GER) is 27.1%– 26.9% for male students and 27.3% for female students. The GER for SC students is 23.4% (22.8% for male students and 23.4% for female students) and for ST students is 18% ( 17.7% for female students and 18.2% for male students)
Low educational attainment is a key challenge faced by weaker sections in the country, including the SC and ST communities, notes the NITI Aayog, a public policy think tank of the government of India, in its Strategy for New India @ 75, a comprehensive national strategy layout for the country’s development.
Despite these findings, the government of India, instead of increasing allocation for scholarship schemes, has discontinued certain successful schemes. Behanbox had reported earlier this year on the disbanding of the National Scheme for Incentive to Girl Child for Secondary Education (NSIGSE), a central government scheme aimed to incentivise education among girls belonging to SC and ST communities. The scheme was discontinued even as the former union education minister Ramesh Pokhariyal recognised its importance in helping girls complete secondary education and transitioning to senior/higher secondary level.
The Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns have widened the existing educational inequalities, with students belonging to marginalized communities falling behind their peers due to unequal access to digital devices and the internet. 40% of Dalit and Adivasi students surveyed by the NCDHR and DAAA could not access online education. 51% of them said that this was due to the unavailability of smartphones or laptops.
Many students belonging to marginalized communities across India have had to drop out of schools and colleges. 68% of the students surveyed, reported not being able to continue their study because of lack of income and food insecurity.
“A major problem is that the students are not getting the funds on time. What we have observed is that students are getting their scholarships anywhere between one to three years after completing their education. This forces them to either drop out of education or take high-interest loans from moneylenders,” said Beena Pallical, general secretary of the Dalit Arthik Adhikar Andolan, an organisation that works on the economic rights of Dalits and Adivasis.
Since most beneficiaries of these scholarship schemes are first generation learners, the scheme is a means to take not just them but their entire family out of poverty, says Pallical.
“Before Rohith Vemula was forced to take his own life, he wrote in his letter that the scholarship money should be paid to his mother because the money had value for the entire family,” she said.
The gendered impact of the inconsistent payments under scholarship schemes on women students has worsened due the pandemic. The struggles of Dalit and Adivasi women students are both socio-cultural and infrastructural.
The study by NCDHR and DAAA noted that 21% women were forced to take up jobs during the pandemic. Fall in family incomes and lack of social insecurity has meant that families are forcing young girls and women to drop out of colleges and into early marriages. One-third of the total students surveyed by the NCDHR and DAAA report did not receive scholarships in the past year. Women students constitute nearly half (47%) of these students.
“We observed that when faced with the struggle to survive with limited resources, women’s education becomes a non-priority. For instance if there was one smartphone in the house, we found that it would be given to the boy,” said Pallical.
Lack of access to digital resources for women is also a barrier in accessing information crucial to educational attainment, especially those related to scholarship schemes.