Hello Behans,
All those who made cracks about wanting to see 2025 off asap for 2026 must have had second thoughts with awful news coming in from across the world of more upheaval, hate, berserk autocrats and bloodshed. But early this week, we had cause to cheer, including at the BehanBox newsroom: the government asked quick-commerce platforms to put a stop to the “10-minute delivery” promise that had always raised questions of safety even as it brought in paltry revenues for the the workers jeopardising life and limb on manic urban roads.
We have been, through persistent reporting, interviews and analysis, exposing the fake narrative of flexibility, freedom and partner-employer equity that the platforms have been promoting. In a sharply reported story, Saumya Kalia had established that the platforms remained loaded in favour of customers and bosses even as workers struggled with the debilitating limitations imposed by a faceless algorithm.
We had followed this with multiple stories on how challenging the task of unionising was for gig workers, especially women and those from marginalised groups, with scattered work schedules and distances and swift retribution for any pushback. And the fact that unemployment is rampant does not help. Despite this, women gig workers from the Urban Company have been advocating for decent work conditions and algorithmic transparency, challenging the idea of flexibility of gig work.
“That’s why unions matter,” says Rikta Krishnaswamy, an organiser with Rajdhani App-Based Workers Union (formerly AIGWU). “We are in a neoliberal age, and with the weakening of the trade union movement, the platforms are shaping the dominant story – that this is flexible work, with lower entry barriers, and full independence. But none of this is true, the lived experience of workers contradicts these claims. We need class and caste organising, and for workers to build these movements to change the narrative.”
There were scattered protests and strikes and we wrote about how hard the aftermath of these were for the workers. On New Year’s eve, more than 40,000 workers led a nationwide strike against unsafe models (including the 10-minute delivery promise) and raised demands for fair pay, algorithmic transparency, insurance, and social security.
The platforms, especially the very vocal Zomato’s CEO, had lashed out at the striking workers referring to them as ‘miscreants’, claiming that the protest had failed and wondering why “If a system were fundamentally unfair, it would not consistently attract and retain so many”. He also pointed out that speeding on roads was an Indian trait and the 10-minute promise was anyway pegged on easy-access warehousing, not delivery. If you have not already, do read journalist Vivek Kaul’s deliciously incisive two-part response (here and here) to these flaky statements.
But the voices of resistance clearly reached those it had to. On January 13, union Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya asked the quick commerce platforms to discontinue their 10-minute promise, noting concerns about safety and rights of gig workers.
The sustained advocacy has also led to the inclusion of the Social Security Code 2020 with social protections, gig worker legislations in states like Karnataka, Jharkhand and Rajasthan, Rs 5 lakh accident insurance in Telangana among others. But we have to be naive to believe that gig work will hereafter be about fair and decent work conditions. Apart from ending unsafe practices in quick commerce, algorithmic transparency and fair wage, the Gig Workers’ Association has also called for the creation of a permanent institutional mechanism for collective dialogue between workers, platforms, and the government.